Past Principal Points

Corporal Punishment

I was rather surprised and amused to find a rather large picture of me on the front page of the Calgary Sun on Saturday. I couldn’t believe that they considered the issue or our part in it that significant—must have been a slow news day! In any event, it is always dicey dealing with the media; it is easy to say too much or say too little and either error can create trouble. On the theory that any publicity is useful, I took a calculated risk, but I’m not sure if it will end up being positive or negative. It certainly isn’t the issue I want to be “infamous” for! J

In any event, where does the recent Supreme Court decision leave us? The Herald has emphasized how parents rights have been upheld because section 43 of the criminal code (that allows for reasonable physical force from parents and teachers) was reaffirmed. However, the court also decided to define certain elements of “reasonable” and has now declared that all corporal punishment of children under two or over twelve is “unreasonable” as is any use of an implement such as a wooden spoon, etc. They also said that it was “unreasonable” for teachers (and I assume this includes principals) to exercise corporal punishment on a parent’s behalf. In light of that, all Koinonia schools have suspended the use of corporal punishment at this time.

While I respect the right of the court to interpret the law as it sees fit, I disagree with their conclusions in numerous ways:

  1. I think hands should be made for loving, and so we have always used a neutral object such as a wooden spoon. Also, a spank with an open hand is usually ineffective for a child over three or four.
  2. Using a spoon or paddle also encourages providing some time out and cooling off for child and parent. We always sent our children to their rooms, took time to think about the appropriate action, and then go the spoon. Children should not be spanked in anger but in love.
  3. Simply because a child is under the age of two and cannot understand all the reasoning behind the punishment, does not invalidate its effectiveness. I don’t need to explain to an 18 month old toddler why touching the electrical socket is wrong; I just want him to stop. His reasoning ability is irrelevant.
  4. The use of the strap in the school, though rather infrequent, is (by students’ own admission to me) a real deterrent. Just knowing that the possibility is there helps to restrain bad behavior and clearly indicates to all the seriousness of the offense.
  5. The evidence in Sweden where spanking was outlawed in 1979 is not encouraging. Between 1979 and 1995 child abuse is up 400% and violence from teens is up 600%. This is the first generation raised without this form of solid discipline.
  6. The idea that violence breeds violence is simply not true. Otherwise, every time we lock up a criminal, we would create a kidnapper. I agree that abuse breeds abuse, but I believe that discipline breeds discipline. The outcome has to do with the reasonableness and legitimacy of the punishment. If people (adults and children) perceive that the punishment is fair, reasonable, and carried out by a legitimate authority, then it is accepted.

The Bible (Prov. 29:15) says, “The rod and reproof bring wisdom, but a child left to himself brings his mother shame.” The court’s decision has undermined both parents’ and teachers’ ability to properly discipline children. I predict that the end result will be increased child abuse in the home as parents grow increasingly frustrated with increasingly disobedient children, and I predict increased suspensions from the school (as has happened in other districts that have banned corporal punishment) as it becomes increasingly difficult to require a change in behavior. Children are quick to learn that the authority figures in their lives can no longer require obedience. “You can’t make me” becomes their all-too-true rally cry. The school will weather this, but I do fear greatly for our homes.

 

Brian Hazeltine, B.Ed., M.A.
Principal,
Airdrie Koinonia Christian School

Copyright © 2003/2004 Airdrie Koinonia Christian School      Last modified: February, 2004